Think Medium: The Case for “Minilateralism” to Boost Naval Shipbuilding

War on the Rocks – NATO’s maritime readiness gap is not simply a matter of numbers but also a question of credibility. In an environment where adversaries are investing heavily in naval capabilities and contesting critical maritime domains, the alliance’s reliance on three overstretched national fleets is a vulnerability that could limit deterrence and operational reach. Without coordinated investment in shipbuilding capacity, workforce regeneration, and fleet modernization among some of its main players, NATO risks having a maritime strategy that outpaces the means to deliver it.

NATO’s Task Force X Baltic Demonstrates Multi-Domain Response to Seabed and Wider Maritime Threats

Naval News – NATO is conducting maritime uncrewed systems (MUS) experimentation in the Baltic Sea to demonstrate both the capacity to accelerate capability delivery and the importance of multi-domain operations (MDO) in building maritime situational awareness (MSA) to secure seabed infrastructure and sea lines of communication (SLOCs).

Keeping America Engaged: Three Possibilities For European Navies

CIMSEC – To keep the U.S. engaged in the waters around Europe, European NATO members must find areas of common interest with the U.S. The threat of China to both European and American security interests creates many such opportunities. By monitoring China’s activities in the Arctic, becoming more active in the Indo-Pacific, and buying American, Europeans can maintain a strong military and industrial link to the U.S. even if U.S. military presence in and around Europe shrinks in the near future.

A Post Mortem of the Red Sea Crisis: NATO vs. the European Union

CIMSEC – A better understanding of expectations and goals in the Red Sea could generate premises to mend transatlantic fences. Presently, no one has the perfect recipe to bring this crisis to a halt, and a split approach has likely extended the crisis. Not only have the Houthis taken the lead in messaging victory, but the first true victim of this crisis – the Israeli port of Eilat – has fallen under financial pressure. Time has run out for the United States to complain about Europe without a plan. Likewise, time has proven that the European Union is still not a reliable security actor. An integrated NATO strategy that accounts for both US and European perspectives is the only choice for victory. The alternative option spells defeat.

The Case For a Baltic SNMG-3: Developing Regional NATO Forces at Sea

CIMSEC – NATO’s return to its core mission of deterrence and the defense of the Euro-Atlantic area has been made only more necessary by Russia’s continued aggressive actions both above and below the threshold of war. Ongoing restructuring of the operational components of the alliance is focusing on regional clusters of mutually supporting states. It is time for the maritime component to evolve in the same way the air and land components are. An SNMG-3 focused on the Baltic would not only allow SNMG-1 to concentrate on its core operational area in the North Atlantic, but it would also send a powerful signal of NATO’s intent to undermine and deter Russian malign actions in the region.

Parting Ways: A NATO Naval Strategy Without America

CIMSEC – In this era of increasing danger, great power competition, and uncertain loyalties, the time has come for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to declare its independence. As at the time of its founding, NATO’s strategic adversary is Russia. But unlike during the Cold War, the Alliance can no longer count on the military and industrial might of the United States in confronting the threat.

What a NATO-Skeptic U.S. means for NATO Maritime Security​

Center for Maritime Strategy – NATO must project power to continue to deter its great power adversaries. European maritime security will depend on NATO states’ ability and willingness to invest in the naval assets necessary to project power, such as aircraft carriers, submarines, and large surface combatants. The tension perceived by NATO defense planners between maritime and continental strategic priorities is an illusion. Decreased reliance on the United States can even be beneficial for the future of the alliance.

Carrier Cooperation: Expanding NATO’s Strength at Sea​

Center for Maritime Strategy – Between Russia, China, Iran, and unforeseen challenges that may emerge, American carriers will be busy confronting threats for quite some time. The more America can depend on allies to complement its carrier power, the better placed it will be to handle these threats. Expanding carrier cooperation to more NATO members is one way to take fuller advantage of NATO’s strength at sea. 

Naval Interoperability and NATO’s Naval Presence: Lessons From the Red Sea

CIMSEC – In short, the Red Sea crisis has reminded the world once again about the importance of maritime commercial connectivity for the global economy. It has, together with the ongoing naval war in the Black Sea, reminded NATO navies that the challenges of this “maritime century” will require bigger and stronger navies, capable of deploying together and addressing threats against them in a joint fashion, including in the highly contested littorals.

Europe’s Marines in the Future European Littoral Operating Environment

War on the Rocks – A viable concept of littoral maneuver can help reduce the possibility of a growing spatial gap between fleets operating at reach with strategic capabilities such as cruise missiles and other elements of the joint force and ensure that both marines and maritime forces more broadly can contribute to a multidomain deep battle.